A Short History of Sample Clearance
How sampling went from an unregulated art form to a licensed one — in three court cases and one disco record.
For hip-hop’s first decade, sampling was largely unlicensed. The records that built the genre were collages of uncleared breaks — nobody had settled whether, or how, you had to pay for them.
1979 — "Good Times" becomes "Rapper’s Delight"
The Sugarhill Gang built "Rapper’s Delight" on the bassline of Chic’s "Good Times." Chic’s Nile Rodgers and Bernard Edwards threatened to sue; the matter settled with Edwards and Rodgers added as songwriters. It became an early template for resolving an uncleared sample after the fact.
1991 — "Thou shalt not steal"
In Grand Upright Music v. Warner Bros., a court found Biz Markie’s uncleared use of Gilbert O’Sullivan’s "Alone Again (Naturally)" infringing — the opinion literally opened with "Thou shalt not steal." The ruling forced the industry to start clearing samples up front.
2005 — "Get a license or do not sample"
In Bridgeport Music v. Dimension Films, the Sixth Circuit held that using any part of a sound recording needs a license — famously summarized as "Get a license or do not sample." It made master clearance effectively mandatory, however short the snippet.
The result is today’s norm: sampling is a licensed practice, and the uncleared classics of the 1980s could not be released the same way now. Our "Amen, Brother" page is a case study in what that history left unresolved.
See it on real pages
Sources
- Grand Upright Music, Ltd. v. Warner Bros. Records Inc., 780 F. Supp. 182 (S.D.N.Y. 1991) ↗ · checked Jul 2026
- Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films, 410 F.3d 792 (6th Cir. 2005) ↗ · checked Jul 2026
- Rapper’s Delight — sampling of Chic’s "Good Times" ↗ · checked Jul 2026